Friends and family bring more happiness than money and possessions. How far do you agree with this statement?
There is no doubt about the fact that happiness is the thing everyone looking for in their whole life. Some people believe that friends and family bring more happiness; others say that happiness comes from money and possessions. In my view, having friends and family makes people happy, yet, having enough money and possessions also creates happiness.
To begin with, happiness is easily found in small things and moments around people’s lives. For instance, just having family meals or spending time going out with friends is enough to make people happy. Second, it is difficult to make people happy when they are lack love. It is shown that good relationships with family and friends keep people happier and healthier. Also, love from friends and family creates spiritual values that other things cannot do. They build people’s happy valuable memories during their lifetime. Last, family members or friends are the greatest supporters providing support, advice, and motivation to people, and these things make family and friends become a great source of happiness.
On the other hand, even though money and possessions cannot buy happiness, they give people access to many things that can lead to happiness. For example, money helps people to have a better comfortable life. Moreover, not having enough money can limit human happiness, even destroy their relationship in a family, or with friends.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that happiness not only comes from spiritual values from family and friends but also material values from money and possessions. It is better to balance both money and possessions as well as family and friends because all of these things are important to happiness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, as well as, in my view, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25547445255 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46117489282 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 425.7 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.134765595 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2666666667 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255691423001 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100106862377 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534343163899 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171992549917 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517186697023 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.