The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps illustrate how changes of the central library during 20 years.
Overall, the central library underwent a dramatic of changes, which can be seen the chairs and tables in the center of the library was reduced. However, the shelfs of children's books and reading room were replaced into lecture room and computer room.
In the north-west, the place for CDs, videos and computer games was transformed into the shelfs of children's fiction books, which can be use for storytelling events. Beyond the children's fiction books used to be the shelfs of adult fiction books but now was turned into the shelf of all reference books. Similarly, the reading room in the south-west today was diminished and made it to the computer room.
The tables and chairs was now erected to made land in the center of the library from the entrance. Children's book in the north-east and the enquiry desk in the south-east were transformed to lecture room and the cafe shop. In the middle of lecture room and the cafe shop today is the place to put adult fiction books, information desk and self-service machine, which was used to be the dult non-fiction books.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83673469388 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51590111769 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.448979591837 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.0297618469 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7777777778 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0528025602235 0.215688989381 24% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0314743559987 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390617885174 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0518127717171 0.15604864568 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405677440475 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.