The ability to learn more than one language will be less important in the future. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of languages learning and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of cognetive skills, such as issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that social benefits can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, improving teaching skills can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in fact that university courses, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered brain ability. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both online teaching and learning English apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, cognitive skills might increase the consequences of linguistics. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with job promotion. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of improving communication skills.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of social behavior far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of bilingual prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 298, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t thorny issues potential implications.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.80888888889 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27584801951 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693333333333 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 417.6 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.315286357 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.818181818 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.25397266985 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0699909121277 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0255629350219 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0358787255978 0.071462118173 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0373740916068 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328569922678 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.