In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion?

Essay topics:

In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion?

These days there are universities and schools which group students based on their academic abilities and this results in heated debate. Grouping of students have advantages and disadvantages which I will be discussing in this essay and will provide my point of view.

At the outset, myriad of arguments can be attributed to the importance of grouping the students based on score achieved. For instance, if bright and weaker students kept different groups than weaker students might not grow satisfactory, since the IQ level of weaker students is almost the same. However, if all levels of students are mixed together than this might improve weaker students since there are students who help peers while studying and also encourage weaker section of the class students to perform better. In addition to this, government should monitor grouping of students performed by universities and schools.

On the other hand, students who are intelligent are mixed with incompetent students, and this might degrade the performance of bright students as teacher has to wait for all students to understand the concept of the subject that teacher is discussing in the classroom.

In conclusion, I feel that students should be grouped based on their academic capabilities so that progress can be seen in all students rather than specific set of students.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, as to, for instance, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1133.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 215.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26976744186 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76368320092 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.544186046512 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.1104596027 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.625 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.875 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.625 7.25397266985 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196090422997 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103607633251 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428683473603 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129445356458 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357158860795 0.0609392437508 59% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.