The advanced medical technology will expand human’s life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
The medical technology has evolved in recent years and it is doing the miracles which were never possible in the past. It has become the talk of the town in recent days when its impact has sparked a heated debate that the avoiding the death by increasing the life expectancy is socially and morally ethical or not. This essay will discuss the point of view of both sides and conclude.
Technology has left its mark in every field and the medical field is one of them. The recent advancement in medicine has not only cure many diseases but also increased the life expectancy rate. For example, there is a machine that can keep a brain-dead person alive for as long as possible. However, it is debatable that to what extent this machine can be used to increase life, the achievement has significant place in history.
On the other hand, the opposition with their reasons to oppose this advancement. While there are blessings of medical achievements, consequences cannot be ignored. The cure for cancer patient is not only expensive but it is also very painful and most of the time patients get killed by the treatment rather than the disease itself. Therefore, medical technology is not a positive notion but it has its disadvantages as well.
The medical technology has increased the life expectancy but there are its drawbacks. This essay discussed the both, benefits and drawback, but benefits outweighs its demerits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92531120332 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66081568014 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564315352697 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1225723985 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3076923077 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5384615385 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.30769230769 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174494437469 0.242375264174 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649407577442 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589694351338 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103300999713 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121284795648 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.