The advanced medical technology will expand human's life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of the advanced medical technology will expand human's life and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the expanding human's life can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the human's life will be expanded by the advanced medical technology can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that the crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, the advancement in medical technology will expand human's life might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of expanding of human's life are depending on the advanced medical technology far outweigh of its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also prove the thorny issues' potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
... inclined to believe that the expanding humans life can be a plus, and I will analyze ...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...essay. From a general standpoint, the humans life will be expanded by the advanced m...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...he benefits of expanding of humans life are depending on the advanced medical technology far ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64285714286 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17598871075 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605263157895 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 494.1 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9193537395 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.454545455 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310969066773 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118748658174 0.0925447433944 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130494414363 0.071462118173 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19512881313 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440711074102 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 53.1260098522 41% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.