Advanced medical technology will extend human life. Do you think it is a blessing or a curse?
Recently, the phenomenon of extending human life by advanced medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of extended human life are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that an extraordinary blessing can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, advanced medical technologies can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of a healthy lifestyle, are remarkable. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of mental situations. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of increasing life expectancy are significant.
From a scientific point of view, poor medical technologies can supply the community with negative influences which are associated with the reality that the demerits of an atrocious cruse are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described physical illnesses. Hence, predicted outcomes of inefficient practitioners are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extending human life by advanced medical technologies far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of sophisticated hospitals prove the significance of a better life, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81545064378 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.36141657177 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648068669528 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4031417866 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.181818182 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1818181818 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307597190419 0.242375264174 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962218370673 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934267316888 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171589710094 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997892133957 0.0609392437508 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.