Age discrimination in the workplace is a simple affair that is easily understood. However, the concerned task, personally, I think, shows the significance of the matter and deserves a greater discussion. I need to explore further as there is a saying, "so many men, so many ideas."
To begin with, I would like to focus on older people face challenges to adopt or update with a new technology which shows the significant role in every aspect. Another fact is the older employee does not want to change their old pace that has great importance in relation to such cases. Besides, it is also noteworthy that this plays a vital role which is more effective. For example, there is no smoke without a fire.
Side by side, there are some other views that are also vital which reflects the essence and magnitude of the elements involved. First of all, the important fact is that the experience of older employees is beneficial to new employees. Moreover, they say the precise information is also an undeniable fact which is according to them is pivotal. For instance, every action has an equal and opposite reaction.
Overall, I have logically delineated the whole issue with complete understanding. So, discrimination against the older worker is illegal. I believe all the relevant aspects have been thoroughly analyzed and require no further elucidation. Nonetheless, the issue should be resolved using a holistic approach in a simple manner as we all know, "much ado about nothing".
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'adopting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: adopting
...o focus on older people face challenges to adopt or update with a new technology which s...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 308, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a simple manner" with adverb for "simple"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...d be resolved using a holistic approach in a simple manner as we all know, 'much ado about no...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, moreover, nonetheless, so, for example, for instance, i think, first of all, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1261.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10526315789 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96893939386 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643724696356 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.3565098081 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0714285714 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6428571429 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.25397266985 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100342309837 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0329035176203 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510205196577 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0577824655617 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473129745755 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.06 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.