Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person's age. In the workspace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimation against old workers be made illegal?
Recent days, there has been colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing the discrimination with old people on work places. While few people believe that it is right to consider age while making decisions about employment, others completely despise it. This essay will elaborate both sides of the argument to prudently persuade why this trend is harmful for the whole society.
To commence with, the elders also should have the right of equality. More specifically, if they would not be having any source of income, how would they survive? In addition, they can be asset for any organisation since they have invaluable experience. Moreover, this elevates their confidence and gives them satisfaction of being inevitable part of our society. In India, for example, in all private and government organisations, people are retired after reaching a defined age which is generally 58 years. Now, even if an employee is physically fit and can pursue his job, he is not allowed to do so. Hence, due to lack of money, it becomes intricate for such people to live their life with self-respect. Seen in this light, the age based decisions on work places should be banned.
Despite the argument above, meanwhile, one school of thought endorses this trend. In other words, they believe that pensioners should not be offered job or should not be promoted, because they cannot bear the work pressure of the contemporary world. Additionally, either these people are not interested to learn the modern technologies, or cannot learn them at fast pace. Admittedly, there might be few issues while dealing with elders, but we should not underestimate that they also supported us when we were child.
In conclusion, I radically believe that government should define and implement strict laws to make age based prejudice illegal.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15436241611 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77365588609 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640939597315 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.2293499739 50.4703680194 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.0 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178940693736 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567843030741 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0623820704237 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101005457274 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.022562199189 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.