Recently, the phenomenon of car damages to the environment and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that a restricted car usage cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that one car for one family can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support reducing the number of cars for families. At first, the advantage of using personal cars is a convenient journey for people. However, being more cars in the cities caused many troubles for societies. For example, crowded streets and baying for more fossil fuels has made many problems for the governments and the environment.
In addition, in-town travel with public transportation decreases time-wasting in highways. Moreover, more fuel consumption is equal to greenhouse gases emission and air pollution. From a scientific research undertaken by a reputable university has shown that a significant number of governmental rules banned families to have more than a car in order to reduce the costs of climate change and global warming.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of less use of personal cars far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of car damages ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the governments and the environment. In addition, in-town travel with public ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of climate change and global warming. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30316742081 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07681660715 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2030827861 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.545454545 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301878165709 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10755761908 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725672220095 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15547543121 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0991977739403 0.0609392437508 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.34 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.