Recently, the phenomenon of cashless society and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of credit cards is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that educating people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, using credit cards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of paying by debit card, as well as having enough credit, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of people in cashless transactions. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both cashless payments and paying by cash apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of socioeconomic, having a cashless society might increase the consequences of the inequity between people. Moreover, fundamental aspects of paying by cash could relate to this reality that the demerits of paying by credit card pertain to older people. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of cashless payment correlate negatively with young people in society. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of cash transactions.
To cinclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of using cash for payments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the elderly people's use prove the significance of using electronic cards, but also pinpoint the problems of using a credit card.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37906137184 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06475019641 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602888086643 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4286165223 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.33740045353 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102077177591 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0731853225184 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19010943178 0.151781067708 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211155298293 0.0609392437508 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.