Certain kinds of music promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of children learning process and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of promoting the learning by music is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined that the classic music style can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, good music can provide the society with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of sensational effects, as well as modern education methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered outstanding effects on learning in kids. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both stylish music and progressive understanding apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, impropriate education method for children might increase the consequence of dirty music. Moreover, fundamental aspects of heavy metal music would relate to this reality that the demerits of unordered teaching pertain to weak progress. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of youth learning is correlated negatively with badly listening habits. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of aggressive reaction.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of special music effects on children learning process far weigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of master price music genre prove the significance of kids life improvement, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63940520446 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13721610692 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661710037175 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.8578945162 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.416666667 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4166666667 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20797278558 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651480913823 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396298267223 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120587409932 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046703373225 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.66 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.