As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is rapid expansion of cities and associated road widening or building new roads to accommodate the burgeoning vehicles. there is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriads of concerns as some people tend to believe that these kind of infrastructure developments can lead to more sophisticated issues like traffic congestion. In my opinion, governments should improve the facilities for public transportation and implement policies which encourages its usage.
There is a deluge of factors in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is improvising public transportation not only benefits in reducing the traffic in cities but also helps in reducing the carbon dioxide gas emissions which is the major cause for ozone depletion. Fo instance, the study conducted by research students from the new South Wales university asserted that restricting the private vehicles in the cities of Australia has decreased the air pollution drastically.
Another pivotal aspect is improved modes of public transportation attract people. government can introduce air-conditioned buses or tram as well as maintain them in a proper way. They also can introduce some schemes which can attract working class like digitalized monthly and quarterly passes which not only benefits the passengers in saving money for the commode but also reduce the overhead of cash transactions.
In view of the aforementioned statements, one can conclude that government has to play a major role in the expansion of cities by improving the public transportation provisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...to accommodate the burgeoning vehicles. there is a widespread worry that this will le...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a myriad' or simply 'myriads'?
Suggestion: a myriad; myriads
...widespread worry that this will lead to a myriads of concerns as some people tend to beli...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 281, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...rns as some people tend to believe that these kind of infrastructure developments can lead...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 83, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Government
...f public transportation attract people. government can introduce air-conditioned buses or ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 163, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a proper way" with adverb for "proper"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... buses or tram as well as maintain them in a proper way. They also can introduce some schemes w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, as to, kind of, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47791164659 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19137399657 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598393574297 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.4837376873 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.4 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.2 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191293903094 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685865821694 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451949316652 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112288651189 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0473735584794 0.0609392437508 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.