As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation
available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
Recently the phenomenon of public transportation has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Is creating better public transportation a solution for expanding cities?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that the government must remain reliable for expanding cities and building more roads. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the environmental standpoint, transportation networks are bound up inextricably with expanded cities, which indicates they lead to both traffic congestion and air pollution. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between noise pollution and deforestation as well as an exponential increase in roads. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of climate change is correlated positively with not only global warming but also building more roads for vehicles.
Within the realm of transportation, without the slightest doubt, more roads attribute to private vehicles, in that it would come down to cars, trucks, and buses. A salient example of such attribution is highways, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take the subway for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint car accidents problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to carpooling, planes, and even trains. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of public transportation in large cities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72030651341 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26310392311 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.693486590038 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9566083399 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.846153846 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84615384615 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183790925066 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522281376116 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0580659293643 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10826109708 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05658017539 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.