The claim that animals have “rights” has been the subject of much debate since the 1970s. Are zoos helping or hurting our animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree?
The fauna are the most attractive being on this planet and we should conserve them whole heartedly. Furthermore, there has been a debate on this subject since 1970 that animals have "rights". There has been an argument stating that should zoos be banned or are zoos helping in conserving the animals. In my opinion, zoos are necessary for nurturing and protecting the animals.
Firstly, in zoos, animals are protected and taken care of from the predators. In the past few years there have been a lot of cases in slaughtering animals in the forests, therefore, zoo provides a much safer environment. For instance, recently there has been a report on tigers wandering off in a jungle and other animals hunted down. This had alarmed the wildlife sanctuaries and they had been moved in a captive and a protected custody.
Secondly, in zoos they are not able to enjoy their freedom and are felt like prisoners. Apparently, some zoos are indulged in mal practices such as training an animal for circus performance, eventually, hitting them with a whip and hurting them. Although, on a larger note they are not killed or slaughtered unlike in jungles. Therefore, zoos have proven to act as an advantage towards saving these species.
On the other hand, the claim that animals have "rights" is nonetheless false because humans are the chief commanders of their lives. To conclude, zoos shouldn't be banned, rather, instead of zoos a plan should be devised about the national parks and the animal freedom.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 11, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
The fauna are the most attractive being on this plane...
^^^
Line 9, column 162, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...nders of their lives. To conclude, zoos shouldnt be banned, rather, instead of zoos a pl...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1277.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06746031746 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89704010946 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587301587302 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.2799877302 50.4703680194 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.2142857143 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4285714286 7.25397266985 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.450843144834 0.242375264174 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137253758597 0.0925447433944 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114625790462 0.071462118173 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265392452206 0.151781067708 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113881333249 0.0609392437508 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.