Recently, the phenomenon of climate change and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debtae. Although contested by many that the matter of government policies is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that companies' strategies can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a environmental standpoint, climate change effects can provide the nature with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact tha merits of industrial companies, as well as governmental regulations, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the role of individuals in climate change. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both government and big companies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, climate change issues might increase the consequences of global warming. Moreover, fundamental aspects of increasing carbon dioxide relate to this reality that the demerits of carbon dioxide emission pertain to companies. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of GHG correlated negatively with government regulations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of individuals' effectiveness.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of improving companies far outweigh its drawbacks, Not only do the advantages of governmental management prove the significance of individuals' positive role, but also pinpoint climate change implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 6, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...alyze that throughout this essay. From a environmental standpoint, climate chang...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.83464566929 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35963131523 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645669291339 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.2283477597 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.727272727 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238746017539 0.242375264174 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0806702292479 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539103727605 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129082935897 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120843974818 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.83 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.