Companies can progress by good communion and collaboration between the employers and staff. Good incentives, individualistic approach, recognition and a pat on the back for the successful completion of a project can enhance the enthusiasm and can lead the company to visionary targets and goals.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement.
Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your experience and observations.
In the modern industries there are good relationship have a costly things between workers and company staff. The warm relation become very sensible thoughts and preparation for new targets for achieve. I am totally agree with this statement that good communion and collobration through get the success in the real taget. I will discuss this point in my further paragraphs.
First of all, in the company there are all things according to target point and there should be warm relation for better conversation. Moreover, company worker and staff worker always understang throughout can lead the project of company requirement. For example, a company have target point and thoughout this target point they always react to each others. Furthermore, there are more responsibilities between the employers and staff and understanding with good possible positive result get in the required time period.
Moreover, company have standard regulaion and based on this factor it will fill by both relations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...ere are good relationship have a costly things between workers and company staff. The ...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...r new targets for achieve. I am totally agree with this statement that good communion...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, moreover, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 31.9359605911 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 845.0 1207.87684729 70% => OK
No of words: 156.0 242.827586207 64% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41666666667 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.92707691288 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82635612665 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 139.433497537 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.621794871795 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 249.3 379.143842365 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5462587547 50.4703680194 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 93.8888888889 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.11111111111 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222030100637 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850569155922 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663785969145 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12926919345 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074996836108 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 55.0591133005 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.