A company’s higher level authorities should get their employees’ inputs during decision-making processes. Discuss. Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.

Recently, the phenomenon of taking the employees' inputs during the decision-making process and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many company authorities that employees' suggestions cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the experiences of workers can be plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support to receive the recommendations of company workers during the decision-making process. At first, maybe the co-workers have not academic education to influence the programming process. However, the employees are making the products and have become familiar with their weaknesses. For example, the workers know the bad materials and could suggest for high-quality materials.
In addition, the employees' opinions may not be highly beneficial. But, taking the ideas of the workers could enhance their loyalty. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2017 has shown that a significant number of reputed companies ask for the experiences of their workers, which caused to enhance their sense of cooperation and loyalty to their firms.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of employees' input in decision-making far outweighed its drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of taking the e...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld suggest for high-quality materials. In addition, the employees opinions may ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ooperation and loyalty to their firms. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 221.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74208144796 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25050690372 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.6052121153 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.363636364 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0909090909 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18285280111 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704548640209 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660131756933 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107041726558 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257310066494 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.