Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss?
Recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing whether higher management should take its employees inputs while taking decisions or not. Every individual old a distinct perspective in this regard. This essay will prudently persuade why taking employees suggestions is essential for overall growth of the organisation.
To commence with, by playing role in such decisions, employees believe that their company value them. More specifically, they feel that they are indispensable part of the firm and work with full enthusiasm and honesty, which ultimately helps the business to grow. According to an empirical research conducted by "World Employee Association", it was found that employees of the organisations, who takes inputs from their staff, are happier and more productive. Seen in this light, it is evident that taking staff inputs is crucial for business' progress.
Another insight that must not be neglected, meanwhile, is to leverage the calibre of employees. In other words, when an individual is working in a specific field for several years, he becomes an expert in that specific area. To illustrate, many times management people do not interact with their clients directly, however, their staff members do so. Hence, they know the real issues, requirements that the customers have, and this data can be vital for top authorities. Therefore, consistent with this line of thinking, employees can play a vital role in a firm's decision-making process.
In conclusion, I radically feel and believe that all the companies should provide some platform to its members where they can share their ideas and help the top-level authorities to take right decisions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'times'' or 'time's'?
Suggestion: times'; time's
...that specific area. To illustrate, many times management people do not interact with ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 269.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42750929368 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99632865001 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64312267658 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2346222146 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.307692308 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6923076923 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28210107889 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839939032981 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102358858381 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186985521512 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117148083538 0.0609392437508 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.