Is competitive environment in school or university good or bad? Discuss and give your own experiences as examples.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the use of computer technology. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in society. In my opinion, computer technology has more negative impacts than positives in society.
On the one hand, critics may point out one of the most significant benefits of computer technology is the availability of extra time. For example, mother unlike in the past now has more time to spend with their families, as less time is spent doing their house chores, thanks to efficient household machinery.
On the other hand, there are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that computer dependency has negative consequences for the community in various ways. Firstly, people are losing their jobs because machines are increasingly taking over the roles of humans, such as in the car manufacturing sector. According to "Times Magazine December 2017 edition", the proportion of Americans employed in manufacturing has dropped down from 30 per cents to 10 per cents today. Secondly, a large portion of the human population has lost enthusiasm because of computer technology and is increasingly becoming lazier and less efficient.
Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking a great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impact of computer technology. Citizens are being encouraged to spend a significant portion of their time in physical activity like games and exercises, in order to compensate for their computer reliance and addiction.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite having some benefits, the drawbacks of computer technology in the society are indeed too dire to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, lastly, may, second, secondly, so, thus, for example, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 31.9359605911 169% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21379310345 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95946455291 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555172413793 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.7988294128 50.4703680194 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.307692308 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.25397266985 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.242375264174 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0925447433944 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.071462118173 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.151781067708 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.