A county becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing whether mixture of various nationalities makes a country more prosperous or not. Every person has a distinct perspective in this regard. This essay will prudently persuade how having indigenous of various countries make a country more prosperous.
First and foremost, mixture of people beings cultural diversity to a nation. In other words, when pilgrims from various other parts of the world, immigrate to a new country, they bring their traditions, history, rituals, and culture with them. Moreover, people broaden their horizon and become aware of other cultures, when they see these wide ranges of beliefs and traditions. For example, in the USA, not only Indians but Americans also celebrate many Indian festivals such as Holi and Diwali. Thus, needless to say, immigrants add cultural diversity in a country and make that country more interesting to live.
Another pivotal benefit of having diversities of nationalities is getting talents in all the fields. To be precise, not all the nations have people capable to perform exponentially well in all the fields. To illustrate, most people in some countries are expert in cooking and farming, whereas in other countries people are specialist in medical science and computers. In this way, when talents from various nations across the globe come to their new place, they contribute to the development of this host country by their talent.
In conclusion, I believe and feel that mixture of nationalities brings myriads advantages to the host nation. Hence, I would recommend that all the countries should promote immigration for the benefit of both, their country and the immigrants.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, moreover, so, thus, well, whereas, for example, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1463.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77396157326 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578181818182 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.1077400162 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.5 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0850773118989 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312138759282 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321917778338 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0535486051495 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313623782503 0.0609392437508 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.