Creativity is born with or can be taught or improved.
It is irrefutable to say that people like Noten and Marx are born with talent. Nowadays there is an ongoing debate on whether creativity can be improved or not, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. In my opinion, creativity can be enhanced by doing self assessment, while on the other hand stand a perspective that it is only God gifted. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
In the very outset, there are myriad of evidence to show how talent can be improved, but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that by evaluating the strengthes and weaknesses an individual can find the areas that need to be work on. By doing this, a candidate will not only get the idea of the areas in which he/she is lacking but also can focus on the specific skills that need to be improved to be more talented. Therefore, by analysing the strongest and weakest points one can improve his/her level of creativity.
Notwithstanding, some people hold an opposing view and tend to believe that the talent is a good gifted trait that cannot be improved with the human efforts. Moreover, people who are born with creativity not necessarly required any kind of training and extra teaching classes, they can performe far more better without training than people who attend institutes. As an illustration, according to the startling new research conducted by the University of Sydney revealed that participant who blessed with creativity usually performe with high level of confidence.
In the light of arguments outlined above one can conclude that although the fact of creativity is born with is true, but the importance of teaching to be creative should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...teaching classes, they can performe far more better without training than people who attend...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, kind of, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1461.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93581081081 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79411091206 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567567567568 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.1968553722 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.818181818 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9090909091 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.09090909091 7.25397266985 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429963564535 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149617948025 0.0925447433944 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922237609764 0.071462118173 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271346449895 0.151781067708 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0674694162168 0.0609392437508 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.