Criminals in prisons are dealing with new cases, and some are teaching them. Which method is more effective to reduce crime rate? Rehabilitation or punishment? Give examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of criminals in prisons are dealing with new cases, and some are teaching them and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complicated procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive. I am inclined to believe that reducing crime rate, rehabilitation, and punishment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the punishment and rehabilitation reduce crime rates in the prisons can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in this fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of this common phenomenon and accordingly complex procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, dealing with new criminals in the prisons, and some are teaching them might increase the consequences of critical issues. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of this remarkable phenomenon.
While there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of teaching criminals in the prisons are dealing with new cases, punishment, and rehabilitation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint the thorny issues' of potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6828358209 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24654099046 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619402985075 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 0.931034482759 644% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8096064081 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.454545455 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365005636309 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115957723948 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119644810245 0.071462118173 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201639287434 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402709252277 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.9 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.