Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping etc. And whether u support them or not
These days the trend of dangerous sports are being popular among youngsters as they enjoy while participating these games. On contrary, some people believe that people should not involve themselves in these games since life risk is involved while performing. This essay will further elaborate the reasons and explanations for the notation and thus deduce the dialectic conclusion.
At the outset, some people enjoy the thrill in games like skiing, bungee jumping and many more. Moreover, they feel that something new has been achieved after performing these games. Another key justification for this notation is that people wanted to try different acts from others so that experience can be shared with other people.
On the other hand, these dangerous games have a risk of life as it is difficult to predict the failure of these games. For instance, there have reported many technical issues while bungee jumping and persons who were doing these games suffered injuries. I feel the government should monitor these games so that standards can be followed as it involves the life risk of a person.
After analyzing, it can be concluded that these dangerous games should not be banned but standard rules should be follow to avoid any kind of incident.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 115, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'followed'?
Suggestion: followed
... be banned but standard rules should be follow to avoid any kind of incident.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, moreover, so, thus, while, for instance, i feel, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 31.9359605911 63% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1054.0 1207.87684729 87% => OK
No of words: 205.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14146341463 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50228212317 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59512195122 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 328.5 379.143842365 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.030227158 50.4703680194 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.4 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0794360790029 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038981224784 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600669593922 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0519144136264 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301829222616 0.0609392437508 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.