With the digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Uneversities should only procure
digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this
position and give your own point of view.
Recently, the phenomenon of digital media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "What are the advantages and disadvantages of procuring digital media rather than updating textbooks?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that providing digital media is highly beneficial for students. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technological standpoint, digital media is bound up inextricably with cyber education, which indicates they lead to both electronic books and electronic devices. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between faster learning and computer-intensive skills as well as an exponential increase in public libraries. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of E-book publications is correlated positively with not only digital media but also easy to access information.
Within the realm of economy and environment, without the slightest doubt, virtual libraries attribute to lower prices, in that it would come down to less cut trees and wasting papers. A salient example of such attribution is internet based lectures, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take digital format for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint education expenses problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to students revenues, avoiding deforestation and even being updated. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of electronic publications.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analysing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of digital media outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analysing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1715.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81355932203 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28622345241 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684745762712 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0409724051 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0714285714 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259576709543 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0690614845081 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0778020280644 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144423181687 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099269559428 0.0609392437508 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.05 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.