Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Today, the packaging is an important procedure all company invests more money on that. Packaging helps to give a new look to a product which attracts the consumer. But, the consumer should avoid over packed products, therefore, its producer responsibility to avoid extra packaging of a product. In this essay, we will discuss the extra packaging of products.
Firstly, packaging helps to describe a product. Over packed product helps to reduce the damaged and it increases the pollution. The producer is the one who should avoid the packed product. For example, Mc Donald takeaway burger is packed three level of packing and customer accepts the same. After eating the burger they throw the packaging in the dustbin or on road. Three level of packaging is unnecessary it is a waste of money and resources. Therefore, it exemplifies that extra packaging is a waste and it increases pollution.
Secondly, over packaging is also good sometimes which helps to reduce the damaged. For example, electronic goods and heavy goods are the product which should be over packed for the safety purpose. Therefore, it exemplifies, that sometimes over packaging product is necessary to keep that product safe.
In the conclusion, no businessman wants to invest more money on extra packaging it is because of a competitive market. Extra packaging is necessary for electronic product but, not in burgers it will increase the price of the product also and it is unnecessary.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1230.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16806722689 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80392856442 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 139.433497537 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453781512605 0.580463131201 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.325123152709 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.1840103042 50.4703680194 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.875 104.977214359 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.875 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331519590715 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128326479435 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1098067861 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219869215169 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0670741106612 0.0609392437508 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 53.1260098522 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.9458128079 80% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.