Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of avoiding of packaged products and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both costructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that responsiblity of the proceducer can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, t3 can provide the society with some notiecable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate environment degridation are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a soil degridation, extra packaging might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is corelated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceives nothion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the befits of consumer avoiding far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential complications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 30, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s essay. From a general standpoint, t3 can provide the society with some notiec...
^^
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...corelated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81355932203 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34930221651 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.703389830508 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.1950409918 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.727272727 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4545454545 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123645775522 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419557701807 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0512291031202 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0667808730682 0.151781067708 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206882577964 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.44 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.