Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers?
Recently, over packaged with one time used plastic or wrapping paper for our consumer goods, which is enhancing environment pollution, have created a heated argument. Whether the responsibility of consumer or producer on this issue, even becomes more controversial topic. In this essay I will elaborate what role does either consumer or producer to reduce over packaged causing environment pollution.
Excessive usage of plastic or wrapping paper for package of consumer goods has drawn attention to public that may enhance our environment pollution, particularly plastic box or paper cannot dissolved in soil. Minimizing usage of plastic has been encouraged by environment activist. As public education becomes more effective, consumers are more awareness how over packaged damage our environment. They started to ask for a minimum package on consumer goods. As a result, we find that many consumer products have become less unnecessary package. The demands have changed the supplier. And it works effectively.
Despite many suppliers reducing over packaged on their products to meet consumer requirement, many retailers continue their tradition practices that allow them creating demands from customer. For example, over packaged chocolate box sells on Valentine day. A fancy package of ordinary chocolate creates a desire for consumer to buy their chocolates. The responsibility of over packaged is from producer.
From my argument points mentioned above, it is very difficult to draw a line who is responsible of over packaged on our consumer goods. However, we all have our responsibilities to remind each other try to minimize our waste on global resources and reduce the amount of pollutants to make our world more sustainable to live for our children in the future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 390, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reduce over packaged causing environment pollution. Excessive usage of plastic...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52919708029 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97319842801 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580291970803 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 58.5432532407 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.6875 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272194155021 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104437209031 0.0925447433944 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0712989850575 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179935514352 0.151781067708 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533963314518 0.0609392437508 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 53.1260098522 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.