In the education system, assessment through written formal examination is valid or not?
Recently, the phenomenon of formal education system and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the significance of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that written asseement can be plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, formal examination can provide the society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that teaching assessment, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experimen which discoverd education asssessment. Thus, beneficial ramifications both examination procedures and oral examination apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, online assessment system might increase the consequences of upgarding assessment system. As a tangible example, some scientific reasearch undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that downside of creative processes is correlated neagtively with education levels. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of writing ability.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of oral examination methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantage of university assignments prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.94323144105 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32062118393 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689956331878 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6141636331 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231948461343 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702986764717 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681928901048 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114285978938 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.049008861367 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.25 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.