Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples.
Recent days, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trends to see prodigies discussing the relation between effective learning and employment. Every individual holds a distinct perspective in this regard. This essay will prudently persuade why it is impossible to combine study with employment.
To begin with, the study requires time. In other words, to comprehend the academic students, one needs to attend the classes, listen to the lectures, and then practice them after college or school hours. For example, as per recent studies, it was found that the students who practice their school subjects more often, understand and perform better in them, than the students who do not practice them. Thus, this example clearly proves that practice is a key to success and practice requires time; which is not feasible along with a job.
Another pivotal aspect is comfort and peace. To be precise, while learning, the mind of a pupil should be in peace and comfort, otherwise, he would not be able to concentrate on his studies. A job brings huge responsibilities, thereby, hinders the interest and concentration in the study. Therefore, it can be stated that work and study cannot go hand in hand.
In conclusion, I radically feel and believe that education and study should not be combined and the person who tries to do so would not be able to perform exceptionally in any of these two. Consequently, I would recommend that the government should not allow people to opt for both these options parallelly.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, so, then, therefore, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1266.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0438247012 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79082456751 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629482071713 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 384.3 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4998681819 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.3846153846 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185244160319 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717200424548 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804891858808 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999334584708 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373297373086 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.