Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment.
Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic?
Support your opinion with example.
Recently, a phenomenon of working along with study has raised debate across the world. Study along with employment is an arduous task for student and should be chosen carefully. Proponents think study and working can give extra experience and prepare students for humongous opportunities in the future, but opponents believe otherwise. In my opinion, student should focus on one task at a time. This essay will illustrate various facts and finding across the subject.
To begin with, effective learning is a difficult task and require dedicated time and efforts. Students are required to complete numerous assignments which put tremendous stress on them. Dedicated study not only require a plethora of time and efforts but also peace of mind for better results at the end of the semester. For example, when I was in college I had to spend four to five hours per day to complete assignments.
In contrast, many students require financial support and start working very early, and it is student's discretion to choose. A study suggests that 45% of students who work and study together fails to complete the degree program; furthermore it impacts their future employment and health. Besides, many believe that study must be completed before starting the employment as studies take colossal effort.
To conclude, it is safe to say that the study requires significant time and peace of mind and working in parallel can influence the performance of student's studies.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Study
...udy has raised debate across the world. study and employment is an arduous task for s...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, so, for example, in contrast, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19491525424 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70835312937 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6534725254 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.3076923077 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235277632984 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872198655825 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0479811205964 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144954585968 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121042346552 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.