Electric car is a solution to both transport and environment issues
Recently, whether electric car is the solution to resolve both transport and environment problems has become a heated debate. Electric car was marketed as a cheap and environment friendly transportation option. However, unstable electricity supply and expensive cost may lead the electric car is rather a burden than an asset to many car users. In this essay I will elaborate and will explain why electric car is not yet the solution to both transport and environment issues.
Electric car, which is different to traditional conventional car, is powered by electricity battery. The battery is rechargeable. Also, the car is powered by battery, there will not have any emission of pollutant, particularly in carbon dioxide which is believed directly related to climate change. Moreover, electric car runs quietly, therefore, it will reduce the noise pollution to zero. It will be a massive benefit to residents who are living in giant city like Sydney.
Despite, there are many benefits of electric car, all these benefits can be offset by increasing electricity demands leading to more power stations needs to build. Coals power station is still the main source of electricity in Australia. The amount of Co2 emission from burning coal for generating electricity is significantly higher than emission from all cars in Australia.
In conclusion, as the points mentioned above, I am inclined to think that electric car is not the solution to both transport and environment issues yet until we have better environment friendly technology to provide a reliable and cheap electricity supply.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 20.9802955665 38% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1346.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34126984127 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96100889836 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9242291109 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.538461538 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.30769230769 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.555448389317 0.242375264174 229% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.203126309715 0.0925447433944 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.167572619335 0.071462118173 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348710785132 0.151781067708 230% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188330117645 0.0609392437508 309% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.