Environmental problems are too great to be managed by individuals so real change can only be achieved at government level.' To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and examples from your own experience.
In the modern world and era, there is an ongoing debate about managing environmental problems by individuals. While there are certaily valid arguments to claim that the real change could be achieved at government level, yet I still believe that both sides should roles up their sleeves and join their hands to address the matters. In this essay the primary reasons associated with this will be discussed and focused on.
Firstly, all sorts of emissions would be controlled by both officials and every member of the public. As an example, greenhouse gases, which are lead to increasing the temperature of the earth’s atmosphere, is produced by carbone dioxid from factories and vehicles alike. Additionally, lacking of monitoring, organizations and every members of society play a prominet role to make contribution to the development of this problems by a few preventative measures. Thus, this makes it clear that why it should be accompanied by both sides as mutual relationship to address environmental disasters.
Secondly, another major contributing issue is the impact of humans on the environment. An outstanding and notable instance to illustrate this is deforestation resulting in the extinction of many species of anilmals and plants in the blink of an eye. In other words, when it comes to environmental degredation natural areas and wild animals are at risk of extinction because of human activity. After analyzing this, it is evident that something must be done by governments and ordinary people to protect such invaluable resources.
As seen above, my personal sentiment is that each and every individual may incline to views this matter differently, but I do hold the belief that had individuals and officials had more positive and mutual relationship, they would have been more successful for implementing novel approaches in order to tackle major and serious environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 290, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sides should roles up their sleeves and join their hands to address the matters....
^^
Line 7, column 87, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'view'.
Suggestion: view
...ach and every individual may incline to views this matter differently, but I do hold ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10323190133 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641196013289 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.0172101859 50.4703680194 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.416666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218037047228 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688971037256 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434169782527 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119008508975 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0615093538781 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.33 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.