Recently, the phenomenon of environmental problems and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that individual managements cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that government programs can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support that the environmental changes can be achieved at the government level. People are responsible for local environmental pollutions such as shores and forests. However, in large-scale pollutions such as global warming, the government can find the best solutions.
In addition, personal cars are the main cause of air pollution resulting in climate change. But, only the government can make rules to prevent and decrease the rates of environmental pollutions such as air pollutions, river, and underground water pollutions. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown that there are influential laws in advanced countries to reduce the number of smokes that spew from the personal cars to reduce the rate of air pollution.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that despite the existence of individual's role on environmental problems, the governments should be responsible in the massive scale of environmental issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of environmenta...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...overnment can find the best solutions. In addition, personal cars are the main ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s to reduce the rate of air pollution. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64159292035 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28277136424 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606194690265 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5991071364 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236930438277 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950133893533 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110346948633 0.071462118173 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141305462286 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657691407695 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.