Essay topics: Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should build more roads to facilitate car ownership? Agree or Disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of expending cities and its correspponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both construcrive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that network for public transportaion can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpiont, improving of pubic transportation can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as altimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. Accorging to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both improving road conditions for car ownerships and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a publuc arena, building more roads might increase the consequences of critical needs. As tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of incereasing of public vehical far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the signigicance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint throny issue’ potential implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 41, Rule ID: PUBIC_X[1]
Message: Did you mean 'public'?
Suggestion: public
...From a general standpiont, improving of pubic transportation can provide the society ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct t...
^^
Line 3, column 291, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...rrelated negatively with vital issues. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82157676349 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32913539945 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.709543568465 0.580463131201 122% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6849656787 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.545454545 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112399343445 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0371820782299 0.0925447433944 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460997782079 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.056567813569 0.151781067708 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245233322618 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.43 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.