Experience is the best teacher. Some people think that life experience is more important than the formal teachers and books in schools and universities. How far do you agree with this statement? Give your reason or provide your personal experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of important life experiences and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of formal teachers and books are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that prestigious schools and universities can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, formal teachers and books in schools and universities can provide society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of brilliant life experiences, are significant. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of experienced students. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of efficient personal efforts are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, personal experiences can supply the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient teachers and publications are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inexperienced people. Hence, predicted outcomes of pointless education are notable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of important life experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of complicated books prove the significance of creative thinking, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89177489177 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34122863243 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 139.433497537 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645021645022 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2367237941 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.727272727 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301320655715 0.242375264174 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882128213285 0.0925447433944 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053228660406 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164449778311 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300369726541 0.0609392437508 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.88 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.