Nowadays, human beings are responsible for deforestation due to the increased need of land for living, which attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. It can be said that by cutting trees human is making the environment conditions worst for all other living habitats. This essay will further elaborate the problems created by the destruction of forests and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the very outset, there are innumerable problems that are outcome of deforestation but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that decrease in the number of trees is the main reason of increasing the amount of carbon dioxide in the environment. Moreover, enhanced CO2 can lead to chronic diseases like as, lung cancer and allergies. As an illustration, according to the startling new research done by the Punjabi University revealed the seventy percent of Indian population is encountered the skin allergy problem because of high level of carbon.
Furthermore, Another key justification to upholding this notion is that human involvement with nature also decreased the average rainfall in the some countries. This is because countries like as India, China, and Russia are facing challenge to meat the demand of water for local population. For example, currently, in india, people do not have free access to the water, they have to pay high price to buy the amount of water they want for their survival. Therefore, the human beings involevment with nature is impacting on them in various ways.
In the view of discussion outlined above, one can conclude that every one should join hand in hand to overcome these problems and to make our environment heathy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 146, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...o decreased the average rainfall in the some countries. This is because countries li...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1418.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13768115942 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84648897326 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626811594203 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.5669167621 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.909090909 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169410979018 0.242375264174 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0556610289273 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039357406097 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823145840299 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.065245406268 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.