Fresh water resources diminsh in large cities in the world each year what are the cause of this crucial problem. What are the solution /
The problem of fresh water resources diminsh in large city in the world each year . Which has always been debatable, has now upsurged a lot of arguments in fever and against it has become even more controversial. The substantial influence of fresh water resources diminsh in large city in the world each year has sparked the controversy over the potential of this trend in an integral part of society in recent years. It can be agreed that upside of fresh water resources diminsh in large city in the world each year is instrumental indeed however it has some various drawback as well. This easy will be elaborate problem assertion and will provide to a well- weighted conclusion.
At the outset there are numerous reasons why fresh water resources diminish in large city in the world each year is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the reason that maximum water use to small work in cities like car washing and the major reason is trees are cutting in cities and land are working in daily routine by the humans day by day and government cannot take action against any person.
However , there are some people , who choose to think differently and hold on opposing view point. Which are the certainly influence to fresh water resources diminish? Nevertheless the contradiction is rooted in the fact that recycle the water which are use again in our life for example which water waste in car washing government should need to set some source or R.O which are purifying water in continue so we can some resources of water save for future.
After overall discussion I conclude that government take some action for save water so we can some resources can be save in our future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 82, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nsh in large city in the world each year . Which has always been debatable, has no...
^^
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...and are working in daily routine by the humans day by day and government cannot take a...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ake action against any person. However , there are some people , who choose to t...
^^
Line 5, column 32, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...erson. However , there are some people , who choose to think differently and hol...
^^
Line 5, column 169, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Nevertheless,
...ence to fresh water resources diminish? Nevertheless the contradiction is rooted in the fact...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: O
...ent should need to set some source or R.O which are purifying water in continue s...
^
Line 7, column 41, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...After overall discussion I conclude that government take some action for save wat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, so, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.79591836735 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52896696515 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510204081633 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 447.3 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 104.356312698 50.4703680194 207% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 141.0 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 7.25397266985 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355632059683 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182309850403 0.0925447433944 197% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.184457420997 0.071462118173 258% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19963404542 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1509226489 0.0609392437508 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.1260098522 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.