Give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn’t have
any effect of his bad neighbourhood
Whether bad neighborhood affects a success of person has been the epicenter of discussion in multiple forums and a conclusive unanimous agreement is yet to be achieved. Different distinguished individuals have expressed their views both in favor and against the very idea of societies influence on people’s success through multiple modes of communication be it a main stream media or be it the social media. Below in essay of mine i will try to enunciate that how Neymor has overcome from the bad neighborhood and became successful person.
One of the most prominent reasons have on children is their friend circle. Moreover, studies also shown that 80% people do not get successful because of their bad company or neighborhood such as people have friends with drug addicted or smokers which can influence the other friends and might force them to try those things. In addition, if a person has more friends who are good in studies then the person might get benefit and will try to study hard because of good friend circle.
On the hand, some people believe that society cannot affect a person if he has good family support and parenting. For example, Neymor has come from really bad neighborhood and that did not affect him to become a successful soccer player of Brazil. Furthermore, he became successful because of his structured family and good parenting.
While on the other hand, there are people who still wrangling about the facts of bad society’s influence on person’s success. I would like to conclude that somehow bad neighborhood can affect people but good parenting can help a child to succeed and become successful person
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...he social media. Below in essay of mine i will try to enunciate that how Neymor h...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, really, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06569343066 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81804767916 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547445255474 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0245538009 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.181818182 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9090909091 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.25397266985 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158550496457 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0713461649601 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434461018621 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109081278768 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0432248310202 0.0609392437508 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.