government focusing on improving transport or build roads for private vehicles
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is that the government is concentrating on improving the transport system for the public. A significant number of people hold that improvement of the transport system is beneficial for the nation, whereas others believe that the government should build more roads for private vehicles. In my opinion, a well-developed and extensive public transport system is salient. This essay will discuss both sides of arguments and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, there are various arguments in my stance but the most preponderant one is that a well-defined public transport system aids people to navigate people easily. Not only it enables the citizen to travel with less cost and comfort but also connects with a myriad of unexplored geographies. For illustration, a study published by Harvard University suggests that entire Europe has an extensive network of the public transportation system. In addition to that, the government concentrate on the continuous development of the interstate system. Needless to say, the government should focus on public transport.
Furthermore, another aspect is that the public transportation system reduces the amount of traffic from the road. It also helps in reducing the air pollution which is a major cause of concern for nations across the globe. For instance, a recent report conducted by Public Health Organisation shows a 25% decrease in the greenhouse gases. Hence, it is apparent that spending time and money on the local transport system is beneficial than private roads.
To sum up, as per the above statements, one can assert that the merits of a solid transport network outweigh its disadvantages. Therefore, it can be deduced that the government should focus on the improvement of public facilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, well, whereas, for instance, in addition, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35069444444 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06294678966 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559027777778 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8934981755 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.733333333 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.25397266985 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335398908266 0.242375264174 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112111967927 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106225296557 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201271860691 0.151781067708 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860917956327 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.