The Government reduce their investment in arts, music and painting agree or disagree
The discussion on government reduce their investment is arts, music and painting is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their arguments. The subject attracts majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant examples and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now days many movies and arts is increasing day by day which is more fine. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that 2017 in one movie is release Singh is king many things learn from her movie and 80% people do like movies. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that many people do like movies but the arts or movies is not best in human life because there are so many sides effects of arts or movies. Besides which this arts do same children do 60% copy same away with this put effects on study and daily routine. Hence, it is apparent why many are against trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of arts or movies because with this development of country are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential overlooked either
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g one is that many people do like movies but the arts or movies is not best in hu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1269.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89961389961 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51671711339 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.5476718074 50.4703680194 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.363636364 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5454545455 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0852548646936 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432658111775 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136818508136 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0601781611856 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104231632679 0.0609392437508 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.32886699507 96% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.