Government should create better network of public transport available
for everyone or build more roads owning population.
Nowadays, it is irrefutable to ignore the importance of a better public transport system. Recently, an ongoing debate on the usage of public transport and better road network has started across the globe. Many people think that the government should create better roads to help citizens, whereas other believe a stable and extensive public transport should be developed. This essay will illustrate both sides of arguments and finally suggest the conclusion.
To commence with, the transport system needs roads to move people and logistics seamlessly from one location to another, therefore a stable and extensive network of public transport is pivotal for the economic growth of the country. Not only it saves a colossal amount of time and resources but also contributes to the economic development of the area or communities. For example, The Netherlands has an extensive network of road and rail network which has helped the economy of the country in the recent years.
On the other hand, more roads are also required to reduce the burden of existing network system. New road helps people and communities to connect with others geographical areas. For instance, in India, The Prime Minister Road Initiative (PMRI) has created a web of roads across the nation, which has connected many remote and urban areas and created a myriad of job opportunities. In addition to that, better roads reduce traffic congestion and save a lot of productive time.
According to the arguments aforementioned, it is safe to assert that a better road and rail network is beneficial for the economic development of the country, and the government should take necessary steps to improve the public transport system.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, so, therefore, whereas, for example, for instance, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 20.9802955665 33% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21897810219 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77914376108 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525547445255 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9789146812 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.358879547676 0.242375264174 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133078438676 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090527016103 0.071462118173 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231890957258 0.151781067708 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0747671102928 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.