Government spending money on old building causes and effects.
As the famous saying goes, “Old is Gold”. The same applies to old buildings, which are reminded to us our historical situations. So, present and next generations people can know about history condition. There are some reasons and effects which I will put in my further paragraphs.
To begin with, olden structure are evidences of understanding our historical realities. Government spend a lot money on it because it can make hitorical place, and more and more individuals know about its characteristics. Moreover, it is to be cultural heritage of the nation. So, people assume the real condition of the present and past, and what different between its. For instance, the design, color, structure, using materials and other necessary things.
Focussing on the effects, individuals can learn in their study the situation in past regarding. If we take care it, future generations would be get inspiration. They will do continue this trend for their next generations. Furthermore, tourists come to visit these old heritage buildings and places which make attractive tourist point. However, it is too costly to maintain these old structures. So, government have to spend more money for old buildings.
To sum-up, old structures of buildings are evidences of culture heritage. Although, government spend more money on it, but these historical structures learn about their past conditions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...ng our historical realities. Government spend a lot money on it because it can make h...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Government) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...ng our historical realities. Government spend a lot money on it because it can make h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44036697248 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00088363386 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 139.433497537 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619266055046 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.5024630542 59% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3831065808 50.4703680194 44% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 69.7647058824 104.977214359 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 12.8235294118 20.9669160288 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 2.91625615764 480% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262080262364 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717474406642 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0913883091968 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163788831655 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0879891413781 0.0609392437508 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.84 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.2 10.9458128079 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.38 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.3980295567 65% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.