is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries?
Recently, the phenomenon of becoming the host of the Olympic Games, and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that hosting these game events cannot be highly beneficial, such an issue regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that performing the Olympic Games as a host can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support receiving sport events. At first, a disadvantage of hosting Olympic events is providing the safety of guests. However, this reception can be highly profitable. For example, the booming tourism industry is one of the advantages of hosting.
In addition, the threat of terrorist attack is other negative effects of receiving the Olympic Games. But, the host countries use this opportunity as a good choice. For instance, a recent scientific research conducted by MIT University researchers in 2016 has shown a significant number of sports federations in host countries could experience the actual sport management situation and train better athletes for the future.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, the benefits of hosting the Olympic Games' athletes far outweighed its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Recently, the phenomenon of becoming the...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. To begin with, there are various reasons...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y is one of the advantages of hosting. In addition, the threat of terrorist att...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... train better athletes for the future. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...athletes far outweighed its drawbacks.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42995169082 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00828513577 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.632850241546 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.723744188 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.181818182 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8181818182 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349659517669 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11966963338 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0917059195432 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20382058672 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683652470352 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.02 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.