Is hosting the Olympic Games bring any benefit to the host countries?
Recently, the phenomenon of hosting the Olympic Games and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of the host countries are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that important benefits can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, hosting sports events can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of the host nations, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of lucrative hosting. Thus, beneficial ramifications of the Olympic Games are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, hosting the Olympic Games can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of costly hosting are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient hosts. Hence, predicted outcomes of host countries are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of hosting the Olympic Games far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of brilliant benefits prove the significance of a modern country, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1258.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56637168142 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09448667088 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62389380531 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 401.4 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3694814052 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.363636364 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.405015270799 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138506213594 0.0925447433944 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973539618102 0.071462118173 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234068274053 0.151781067708 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0331719022561 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.64 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.