How do you think that the design of building has impacts, either positively or negatively, on where people live and work?
Recently the building designs have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative impacts?". Whereas, it is a widely held view that a suitable design is highly beneficial for residents. I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the technical standpoint, building construction is bound up inextricably with architectural designs, which indicates they lead to both floor spaces and elevators. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists demonstrates the relationship between skyscrapers and building plans as well as an exponential increase in modern designs. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of concrete usage is correlated positively with not only earthquake withstanding but also people's safety and premises.
Within the realm of socio-economy, without the slightest doubt, eye-catching apartments attribute to the symbol of cities, in that it would come down to balconies, playgrounds, and facilities. A salient example of such attribution is external views, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take frontage for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint old houses problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to multi-purpose structures, high-rise buildings, and even low-rise building. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of building designs in people's life.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that practical building designs can have positive impacts on individual's life. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 203, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...ng designs can have positive impacts on individuals life. However, with the benefit of hind...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.81754385965 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24048717881 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687719298246 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 503.1 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4271446797 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.428571429 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115646888769 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357382799199 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0462587403543 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678666237405 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168923169262 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.