How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
It often believed that individuals are consuming most of their time at work than having more time with their loved ones and that they may feel inadequacy of time. In my perspective, it is a very common scenario in today's modern world because people want to save more money and due to their nature of work which would affect their family life. This essay will discuss further my justifications about the given argument.
To begin with, numerous of employees are mostly used to rendering of overtime while at work. They are about to extend the usual eight hours of work to 10 up to 18 hours. This is probably due to the industry they are into. Some companies are giving their workers too much workload that they cannot able to finish it within the day. As a result, they are going beyond eight hours just to accomplish the said task. To illustrate, manufacturing firms are at 24-hr operation, hence would need workers on duty for the entire day without a gap.
on
Furthermore, this phenomenon would perhaps become a psychological problem to people. They may feel burn-out during off-duty and may possibly would not be able to function well in their respective household roles. For example, working mothers would still finish home chores even though they are already tired. Seemingly, this would affect the relationship of employees who are working overtime with their families.
To recapitulate, people who spends a lot of time at work will have pros and cons when it comes to their personal relationships. It would all depend on the person who will utilize quality time with his family and loved ones during day-offs to mitigate this circumstance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...duty for the entire day without a gap. on Furthermore, this phenomenon would p...
^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...y may feel burn-out during off-duty and may possibly would not be able to function well in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 129, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...y may feel burn-out during off-duty and may possibly would not be able to function well in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, so, still, well, while, for example, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1377.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90035587189 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57949926168 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5871886121 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.6238010939 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211834888394 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660820303378 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692398507797 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135799468959 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.074028642242 0.0609392437508 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 68.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.