Imitating in sports and movies good or bad.
The discussion on imitating in sports and movies good or bad is a debatable topic and people around he globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain of this argument but the most preponderant one stems of the fact is that now days many movies or sports team is increasing time by time which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports and movies more important in human life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainty overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that people do like movies but which is not good because the movies in all shown not good any shown there are also strings such as drink and drug with of more bad effects on children. Besides, children do some copy which movies in do actor which is very bad. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of movies or sports are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: HE_THE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'around the globe'?
Suggestion: around the globe
... or bad is a debatable topic and people around he globe are divided in their argument. The subj...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 369, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand ...
^^
Line 13, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wbacks should not be overlooked either.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82692307692 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49711075649 2.71678728327 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.2143064935 50.4703680194 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337447548149 0.242375264174 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11722230492 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133938628561 0.071462118173 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18372270883 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420883131042 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 53.1260098522 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 55.0591133005 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.