Imitating in sports and movies good or bad.
The /iscussion on imitating in sports and movies good or bad is a debatable thain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant example and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriakld of reasons which will further explain of this argument but the most preponderant one stems of the fact is that now days many movies or sports team is increasing time by time which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports and movies more important in human life. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainty overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is thjatd drug with of more bad effects on children. Besides, children do some copy which movies in do actor which is very bad. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits ofinstrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks shouldk not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 234, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...which is more fine because there are so many type of get knowledge from movies or sports ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 371, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... pivotal aspect of this argument is that Needless to say, all these merits stand ...
^^
Line 13, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...backs shouldk not be overlooked either.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 1207.87684729 86% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98076923077 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67106575559 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 321.3 379.143842365 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.0791275344 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.111111111 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280455905328 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101751750174 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150463315114 0.071462118173 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151560811975 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115270868232 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.