The importance of travel seems to be overrated. Brilliant scholars locked themselves at home. Travel is important for education. To what extent to you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of traveling importance and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that matters of brilliant scholars are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that agreeing travels can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the overrated importance of traveling can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of brilliant scholars, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the importance of education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of important travel are visible.
From a scientific point of view, the importance of traveling can provide the community with negative impacts which are associated with the reality that the demerits of inefficient education are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described costly travel. Hence, predicted outcomes of locked homes are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of overrated traveling importance far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational travels prove the significance of sophisticated scholars, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88127853881 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31229993705 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639269406393 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1154154634 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331569105239 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116588339673 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448898707892 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186973573226 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182168070412 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1288.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.88127853881 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31229993705 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639269406393 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1154154634 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.090909091 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331569105239 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116588339673 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448898707892 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186973573226 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182168070412 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.92 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.